Showing posts with label OneWorldOrder. Show all posts
Showing posts with label OneWorldOrder. Show all posts

Tuesday, April 12, 2016

~An Article Detailing U.S. Government Funded Eco/Bio-Terrorism On An Indigenous Navajo American Reservation~

~This is an article I wish to share, written by another, unlike all of my other blogs, but never the less powerful in bringing about awareness of an issue that has been, and still is, all to common in the United States on tribal lands. It is an issue of Government sanctioned eco-and-bio-terrorism which has cost and continues to cost countless, unreported, Indigenous American lives from numerous tribal reservations and Indigenous/Native American communities. Just like the Navajo communities spoken of in this article below...
~
For The Navajo Nation, Uranium Mining's Deadly a legacy that poisons the land and it will never go away, which lingers from one generation to the next generation.
The federal government is cleaning up a long legacy of uranium mining within the Navajo Nation — some 27,000 square miles spread across Utah, New Mexico and Arizona that is home to more than 250,000 people.


Many Navajo people have died of kidney failure and cancer, conditions linked to uranium contamination. And new research from the CDC shows uranium in babies born now.


Mining companies blasted 4 million tons of uranium out of Navajo land between 1944 and 1986. The federal government purchased the ore to make atomic weapons. As the Cold War threat petered out the companies left, abandoning more than 500 mines.


Many Navajo unwittingly let their livestock drink from those pools, and their children play in mine debris piles. Some even built their homes out of uranium.


"Flint (Michigan) might feel really far away from the Navajo Nation in rural Arizona. But when you look at the demographics of it, it really isn't," he says. "This is a community that has found themselves voiceless."


A sign at the old Kerr-McGee uranium mill site in Grants, N.M., warns of radioactive material. This week, the Justice Department announced a $5 billion settlement against the mining company to pay for the cleanup of toxic sites the company left across the U.S. over a period of more than eight decades.


~Navajo Nation Farmers Feel The Weight Of Colorado Mine Spill~



The U.S. Justice Department has recently gone after some of the mining companies. Since 2008, the Environmental Protection Agency has hauled away thousands of cubic yards of mine waste and has rebuilt nearly 50 contaminated homes, says EPA Regional Administrator Jared Blumenfeld. But there's still much more to be done.


One company, Anadarko Petroleum, and its subsidiary Kerr-McGee recently paid $1 billion to the Navajo Nation for cleanup and as compensation to people living with the effects of uranium contamination.


But one-third of the mining companies have shut down or have run out of money. The federal government knew about some of the dangers decades ago, but only started the cleanup in recent years.


And the uranium issue on the Navajo Nation is part of a much bigger problem. Across the western United States there are more than 160,000 abandoned hard rock mines — thousands of which continue to pollute.


Since 2006 prices for Uranium ore has been climbing and now the mines are back and they want to take more Uranium from the land and the South West Tribes oppose these advances to pick up where the mines left off.


The Legacy of Uranium in Northern Arizona is three Superfund Clean Ups, two in Tuba City, the Rare Metals Mill and the AEC Ore Buying Station (stockpiled uranium ore from other sites for processing) and the Monument Valley Mill site, the New Mexico Tumor Registry is providing information on clusters of cancers, many premature deaths of Uranium Miners many with lung cancers and still decades of study and little action.


Saturday, March 22, 2014

Government Backed, Corporate, Eco-Terrorism Is Becoming Epidemic

DESPITE BEING INVESTIGATE BY THE FEDS FOR CRIMINAL CHARGES, DUKE ENERGY CONTINUES TO POLLUTE RELEASING TOXIC COAL ASH INTO CAPE FEAR RIVER IN NORTH CAROLINA. ht...tp://twitpic.com/dywgl7 ‪#‎GOVERNOR‬ ‪#‎NORTHCAROLINA‬ ‪#‎DUKEENERGY‬ ‪#‎COALASHSPILL‬ ‪#‎DANRIVER‬ ‪#‎DENR‬ ‪#‎WATERKEEPERALLIANCE‬ ‪#‎TOXIC‬ ‪#‎CANCER‬ ‪#‎POLLUTION‬ ‪#‎FRACKING‬ ‪#‎ELSIPOGTOG‬ ‪#‎FASCISM‬ ‪#‎NAZI‬ ‪#‎HITLERHARPER‬ ‪#‎FRAUD‬ ‪#‎CORRUPT‬ ‪#‎GREED‬ ‪#‎HYPOCRITE‬ ‪#‎SATAN‬ ‪#‎EVIL‬ ‪#‎HARPERISADICK‬ ‪#‎HARPERSUCKMOOSEBALLS‬ ‪#‎HARPERNOMORE‬ ‪#‎TREAYSEVEN‬ ‪#‎STOPHARPER‬ ‪#‎STOPREDFORD‬ ‪#‎LIES‬ ‪#‎NOFRACKING‬ ‪#‎NOTARSANDS‬ #NOKXL #STOPKXL
-via Michael Bean & EcoWatch



Breaking: Duke Energy Caught Dumping Wastewater from Coal Ash Lagoon Into Local Watershed
Waterkeeper Alliance released aerial surveillance photos taken from a fixed-wing aircraft last week which show Duke Energy workers pumping wastewater from two of Duke Energy’s toxic coal ash lagoons into a canal that drains into the Cape Fear River.


The revelation comes less than two months after the Dan River disaster, where at least 30,000 tons of coal ash spilled from another of Duke Energy’s toxic coal ash lagoons. The pumping also came just days before a federal grand jury convenes in Raleigh to hear evidence in a criminal investigation of Duke Energy, the North Carolina Dept. of Environment and Natural Resources (DENR) and the handling of coal ash.


In these revealing stories in Sunday’s New York Times and Monday’s Los Angeles Times, Duke Energy admitted its workers were pumping coal ash wastewater out of a toxic wastewater pond and into a canal which drains into the Cape Fear River. The Cape Fear River is a source of public drinking water for residents in Fayetteville, Sanford, Dunn, Harnett County, Fort Bragg and Wilmington.


Even more startling, Duke Energy described the pumping of coal ash wastewater into a watershed as part of “routine maintenance.” The New York Times quoted Duke Energy spokesman Jeff Brooks as saying: “They’re lowering the water to conduct the maintenance they need to.” According to the New York Times, Duke claims it notified state regulators—a claim that was contradicted by officials with DENR...Duke Energy cannot lawfully discharge any pollutant to a waterway without a proper permit in place.


“To label the secret, unmitigated, intentional discharge of untold amounts of highly toxic wastewater as ‘routine maintenance’ seems ludicrous,” said Peter Harrison of the Waterkeeper Alliance. “Here, Duke Energy has admitted that it deliberately emptied the contents of its ash ponds into the Cape Fear River watershed, just weeks after decimating at least 70 miles of the Dan River with its coal ash, and just days before it will appear in front of a federal grand jury for its suspected criminal activity related to its coal ash.”


DENR has indicated that Duke did not notify the agency prior to pumping the ponds, and that regulators noticed the pumping during a site visit on an unspecified day last week. “If DENR did not authorize Duke’s pumping, it would show an appalling disregard for the law and the welfare of North Carolinians,” Harrison added.


Cape Fear Riverkeeper Kemp Burdette said, “I am gravely concerned that neither Duke nor DENR gave any public notice that untold gallons of concentrated untreated coal ash waste was deliberately dumped into the Cape Fear watershed. Hundreds of thousands of North Carolinians rely on the Cape Fear river for drinking water, fishing and swimming. We do not want heavy metals from coal ash in our river.”


Waterkeeper Alliance Global Coal Campaign Coordinator Donna Lisenby said, “Duke never obtained an official modification of its NPDES permit to allow the discharge the highly concentrated coal ash waste water from the bottom of their ponds into the Cape Fear river watershed—if it had happened through open channels, the public would have had a chance to object. This was either illegal, unilateral action by Duke—or a quiet backroom deal with DENR. There is no evidence that any valid, publicly available permit allows them to discharge untold gallons of untreated concentrated coal ash waste water. Duke Energy should provide the specific language from the permit they claim allowed them to discharge highly concentrated untreated coal ash waste water into a standing body of water with almost no flow to dilute it.”
CONTINUES HERE -
http://ecowatch.com/2014/03/17/duke-energy-coal-ash/




Now the author of this blog would like to pose a question to yet another report of blatant and unlawful corporate terrorism. A question in the irony of what is considered justifiable as counter-terrorism operations:




What would they say if patriots determined to 'defend their country' began engaging in a war of attrition against these 'Terrorists'?


Would the homeland security warriors be declared the terrorists, in a political spin to make the real terrorists appear the innocent victims?


 If Al Qaeda was dumping lethal chemicals into our drinking water the military would send counter-terror units to neutralize & assassinate such terrorists...


However a wealthy corporation w/political support bought w/bribes can engage in same terrorism and it's 'legal'. Anyone who opposes them is labeled the 'Terrorists'.


So when is it justifiable to engage in guerrilla warfare tactics the way the European-American colonists did against the British, which so many today propagate as heroism?


 When is it justifiable, only after their is so little fresh drinking water left that we must engage in war over water rights in order to survive?Or is it justifiable before it comes to that?


Would they engage in such behavior in Afghanistan where IEDs & Pashtu snipers would await them at every phase of their eco/human rights terrorist activity?


When does it become justifiable for patriotic citizens to follow in the footsteps of the American colonists who raised up arms to liberate themselves from government tyranny and oppression?


When does it become justifiable for patriotic citizens who value their innate human rights and the rights of their children to have protected, life giving, drinking water and healthy, food producing, soil that sustains all life on this planet?


When is it justifiable to take up heroic arms against such terrorism which seriously threatens our survivability and effects everyone who relies upon clean drinking water and soil capable of bearing food?


We hear them claim that their corporate actions provide lucrative jobs to families and thereby is vital to the economy. But can we eat and drink the money which they seem to sow readily in order to facilitate their terrorist activities once the water is undrinkable, the soil will no longer bear fruit, vegetables, grains, or grasses for our livestock to graze?


If their actions are threatening the very existence of 'all' people and future generations then does not this constitute terrorism? Even more so, is it not global terrorism?


Because they have the money to buy political support for their terrorist activities and those political powers have the authority of law enforcement agencies at their disposal does that mean that anyone whom opposes them is 'really' the criminals or the terrorists?


Here is a thought...Had the British defeated the English-American colonists George Washington would not have gone down in history books as a patriotic hero but would have been hanged as a traitor to the British Army and a rebel insurgent leader. And the history books would remember him as nothing more than a leader of a guerilla rebel insurrection against the British crown.


We know that semantics play a huge roll in the way governments write and enforce laws, particularly speaking when we are speaking of a corrupt government involved in machinating schemes for the love of material wealth and the increased political and military might which that affords.


Do such semantics play powerful role in controlling the way the populace views what is morally justifiable and unjustifiable in terms of survival? Do we allow such semantics to control what we deem as justifiable in terms of self-defense, defense of our children, and defense of our countries' life sustaining capabilities? Our land's water and food bearing capabilities?


Are not such things worthy of protecting and fighting, even dying, for? Without them will we not meet death anyway?


And would going to war against such terrorism prevent a more massive civil war in the future when there is not enough suitable drinking water and food bearing land that the people will be forced to engage in horrific civil wars in order to simply survive?

Is it justifiable to engage in asymmetric warfare against the entities and their operations responsible for these terroristic activities earlier on in order to save multitudes of human lives later on when the full fruition of  their destructive activities has left the masses at an impasse to survival?


Is it justifiable to act as patriots in the defense of not one's national pride but for the survival of one's country, one's community, one's family, one's children, ones future? All of which whom face immediate threat to their future survival.


Such political powers and their corporate terrorist masters are all too happy to keep the masses distracted with escapism in the form of frivolous television shows, social internet sites, propaganda media, video games, opulent consumerism, and vice.


Just as a clever slight of hand artist or confidence artist distracts his victims into looking one direction while he deceives them in the other, so do these politically backed corporate terrorists who destroy the very life sustaining water and soil that we as the people 'must' protect in order to survive! In order for our children to survive!


So again I ask myself and the people when is it justifiable to fight against such tyranny and terrorism when time and time again we witness that they do not honor the laws of the land, of the courts, and seem to operate above the law? When they thumb their noses at the constitutional rights of the people, the innate rights of all human beings, at the ruling of any reasonable authorities, and demonstrate a blatant disregard for 'Life' itself...


When is it enough and when is it right for the people to act when civil courts have proven impotent against such lawless and politically influential terrorists against the human race?


I ask myself and my fellow conscientious human beings when?


AnDrew*

Sunday, September 1, 2013

Strategy of Terror* Black Ops* Destabilize society* Declare State of Emergency*



  
Massachusetts and the city of Boston have some of the strictest gun laws in the and yet this didn’t stop terrorist from acquiring firearms and building explosives.
            
   Strategy of Terror refers to black operations performed by nefarious groups within the government whom believe that the sacrificing of a few is for a greater good for the many, according to their own beliefs and global agendas. They carry these operations out via ‘false flag’ terrorist attacks meant to appear as the work of our enemies in order to instill shock and fear into a society to create a psychological 'stampede', if you will, to encourage the masses to willingly run straight towards the agenda prepared for them by a government entity.   

   If a government were to create fear and panic by injecting terroristic actions into society then many would rally to the government's proposal of national disarmament of citizens thus facilitating the next step in their machinations towards Totalitarianism.    Disarming citizens would not protect them from crime but is rather meant to ‘defang’ them to facilitate the machinations of a totalitarian government which hides its face behind a mask of democracy until it is safe to remove that mask...Once its citizens have been ‘defanged’. So a strategy of terror could very well be the catalyst needed to coerce citizens by fear into throwing themselves at the mercy of their government.    

  Currently defanging citizens seems to be a trend being followed by many of the governments of the United Nations: Engaging in the disarmament of private citizens, even if a Strategy of Terror via ‘false flag terrorist attacks’ must be used to lead them into willingly accepting such 'de-fangment'.

  First the U.K., followed by Australia, and now recently the U.S. government is pushing the issue here in North America. Met by strong opposition by certain Constitutional Rights advocates, such as the N.R.A., it would seem that ‘strategy of terror operations’ via false flag terrorist attacks, like the U.S. intelligence community once engaged in during the Cold War Era in Europe known as Operation Gladio, would be effective in swaying the masses to relinquish the power of the people and give absolute power to their government. 

 Fear is a great tool in manipulating the human mind, will, and emotions. Fear is how every great totalitarian government or dictatorship rose to power throughout world history, by swaying the mind, will, and emotions of the masses. And once they disarmed their citizens they were able to carry out their plans through military prowess and naked aggression.
 
 Would they engage in terrorist false flag operations to destabilize society, sway the hearts & minds of the masses, and facilitate their agendas? In war generals will intentionally sacrifice a portion of their soldiers to achieve their overall objective, much like a Chess game, and this is considered acceptable losses. They're casualties of war.

   So would governments with such a mindset engage in such Machiavellian type machinations against their own civilian populations? History says 'absolutely', because it's been done before and many times since!
 
   Historically when a government sought to disarm it's populace from having the ability to defend itself from military/government aggression that populace (Country) without fail suffered a Totalitarian Revolution resulting in the oppression, if not genocide, of particular groups within that very country. 
 
   Let me close with this, "History is a revolving door." Those whom refuse to learn from it are destined to suffer from her most devoted and uncouth students.
 
   Them being possessed with the unquenchable thirst for power. While absolute power corrupts absolutely.*

#OperationGladio
#CommitteeOf300DeclassifiedCIAreport
#IdeologicalSubversion
#Globalism
#OneWorldOrder
#OneWorldGovernment
#TedGundersonChronicles

Monday, April 22, 2013

ANTI-GUN LAWS IN THE U.S. FOR PRIVATE CITIZENS.

      Outlawing private citizens from legally owning firearms in the U.S. is not meant to protect citizens from criminal violence but is an attempt by a government entity with machinatious plans to 'de-fang' it's citizens before it can safely reveal the totalitarian face that it hides from it's people behind the mask of democracy.
     We can see by statistics and through reports of citizens in the U.K. that home invasion crimes skyrocketed after private citizens were ordered to turn over all of their legally owned firearms to the police and government agencies. Recent events in the city of Boston Masachussetts, where they have some of the strictest gun laws within the U.S., show that stricter gun laws do not protect the good citizens of a state or country. If anything it only emboldens the terrorists and criminals with the confidence that they can walk around without trepidation and confidently shoot our citizens, like fish in a barrel, without fear of being shot back at by any of their victims. I can tell you that passing anti-'anything' laws does not give the citizens more security and our government knows this.
     Criminals will always find a way to obtain what it is that they want while only the law abiding citizens will be the ones without it. We've outlawed cocaine yet we have the largest cocaine epidemic in the world! We outlawed all illegal drugs and yet we have a country infested with a major drug epidemic and a large gangster subculture that makes no attempt to hide it's face but is celibrated in hip hop/gangsta rap music, gangsta films, urban culture, and in various other forms of media in the U.S.. So do we believe that criminals will be unarmed by passing anti-gun laws for private citizens? Of course not! Therefore what could be the government's true motive for such a push against the 2nd ammendment?
    Whatever it is that is being planned behind closed doors with secret handshakes and machinatious aforethought requires that the government first 'de-fang' it's private citizens so that future rebellions may be squashed with relative ease. They can't afford another revolutionary war against a totalitarian government presence, as the english colonists and their allies fought against the british during the American Revolutionary War. And whatever it is that they have planned causes them to believe that they will be met with stiff resistance from the citizens. So first they must disarm them: 'de-fang' their citizens. Only then can it remove the mask of democracy to reveal it's totalitarian face.
     May we awaken from our slumber and shake off the haze from our eyes to see what is 'behind' what is being said rather than focusing upon only the prevaricative words of those who would have you remain engrossed in the mundane and frivolous as they work to re-create a new world without the hinderences of such archaic things as The U.S. Constitutional Rights of the People.
    The constitution was written to protect the People from totalitarianism and governmental oppression of the people. The people are to control the government and not the other way around. But the government believes that the people are the sheep and the government is the shepard.       The sheep do not know what is good for them therefore the shepard will rule the sheep and tend to their needs if only the sheep will blindly follow. And the one's that wander or rebel against the shepard, he does not carry his rod and his staff in vain. 
      For those who don't think the government would never be so machinatious, just close your eyes and go back to sleep and Uncle Sam will bring you lots of presents.
     "Govern me harder daddy", seems to be the mantra of the masses whom cry out for Democratic-Socialist Tyranny, Transnational Corporate Globalism as well as those whom desire Communism. 
       
            HOO-AH 4 LIFE.