Showing posts with label Ecology. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Ecology. Show all posts
Friday, April 22, 2016
~KLEENEX AND PAPERFORWATER.ORG HAVE PROVIDED MUCH NEEDED WATER TO A DINE' NAVAJO FAMILY AND YET SOME HAVE CRITICIZED THIS ACT OF KINDNESS WITH IGNORANCE~
~ Upon recently viewing a wonderful video documentary of a project that a generous American family and Kleenex corporation teamed up to bring water to a Dine'/ Navajo family I felt moved in my heart to feel gratitude to the Creator Almighty for placing such kindness into the hearts of his children to perform such altruistic acts of unadulterated charity for the suffering and to raise much needed awareness of the inhumane situations which have been imposed upon many Indigenous tribes throughout the United States, as well as Canada, for many generations while the government controlled media effectively has kept the mainstream American public ignorant of these human rights violations and inhumane conditions deliberately imposed upon Indigenous tribes with the U.S.A. for the purpose of making living conditions so intolerable that the people will give up their communities, their homes, their culture, and their language to disperse themselves throughout U.S. cities and vanish completely in the way that mainstream American television, Hollywood movies, and government public school's history books have attempted to portray to the world for such a very long time.
~ Thank you Kleenex and PAPERFORWATER.ORG for bringing public awareness about an issue that has plagued many Native communities for many generations without receiving 'any' attention or news coverage from the Government controlled media.
~However, let me add, as soon as I was brought to such joy over this beautiful act of kindness I soon read the jealous, angry, and bigoted remarks of some non-native Americans in the comment section below the film. To may surprise most of these negative comments came from Americans whom not many generations ago were a minority in their own right within the United States.
~In response to the plethora of negative and misinformed comments spewed by many of the non-tribal/non-indigenous Americans whom have been fed Government disinformation and public school propaganda all of their lives there are some facts I feel led to 'briefly' touch upon so that only willful ignorance will be the blame of anyone whom shares their ideas and reads this brief writing.
~For the people in Flint, whom have 'recently' had to experience this hardship, and have received so much media attention with such little help, I pray that they shall receive relief very soon.
~I'd like to say that the Government doesn't take care of people on the Rez, but in fact have always done and continue to do everything in their power to machinate against the people, poison the land, increase hardships, and subtly continue the genocide against Native people while controlling the media and silencing Native activists, through the F.B.I., who succeed in drawing any National attention to the oppression, biological terrorism, and deliberate indifference being imposed upon Native communities across the U.S. who are determined to maintain tribal and ethnic identity as well as culture and language...
~What does the B.L.M. have to do with it, is that the Bureau of Land Management control reservation land and rule it with an iron fist. The B.L.M. is the arm which Uncle Sam and corporations enact land grabs through breech of treaty, strip mine and poison the land and water, create bio-and-eco-terrorism on reservations which result in epidemic proportions of death, birth defects, still born babies, dying cattle, land that is increasingly more impossible to farm, restriction of where one can now set down a trailer or build a home on the reservation, the granting nuclear power facilities permits to operate on reservation lands and pollute with more toxic chemicals, the B.L.M. grants mining corporations permits to mine radioactive minerals on reservation lands despite tribal protests and cares not about the epidemic deaths and birth defects which have come/are coming from this, and numerous other issues which Americans are unaware of because the Government controlled media will 'never' report on these issues.
~Native people are still the forgotten people and in mainstream American society usually only come up (often erroneously) in history books, Hollywood westerns, and whenever someone claims that they're grandmother was a Choctaw or Cherokee princess or their grandfather was a Choctaw or Cherokee chief. Or when propagandist want to rewrite our history in order to destroy Native people's origins and ancestral ties to this land while strengthening their own claims to this land, in espousing prevarications concerning an ancient immigration from Asia (even though recent DNA studies have proven no genetic ancestry to Asians, Africans or Europeans within our full blood Native family member and tribal members DNA). And any other time Natives are addressed by American public is referring to casinos, which not all tribes have nor do all tribal members receive financial benefits from them.
~In fact the Government receives most of the revenue from them and that is why they are allowed to operate on or near 'some' reservations. Never the less, majority of Native fathers and many mothers are forced to work off the Rez and send money home to their children, as they watch them grow up in photos the way prison inmates do with their children, and then there is the massive unspoken epidemic, which the Government controlled media and law enforcement hide from the American public, which is the epidemic of missing, vanishing, and murdered Native women and children across all of North America...
~They report on the missing and murdered children and women of 'every other racial group' that makes up the American population, but they NEVER report the 'statistically' greater disappearances and murders being committed annually against our sisters, aunties, daughters, mothers, cousins, and children in this country.
~Canada has only recently acknowledged this ethnically disproportionate epidemic suffered by Natives and ignored for decades by police, media, and the government. But the U.S. Government and media still sweeps it under the rug and continues to save their tears for the misfortunes and injustice suffered by everyone else in the earth, yet not for Indigenous Native American Tribal people...but I digress. (Peace be with you all.)
Tuesday, April 12, 2016
~An Article Detailing U.S. Government Funded Eco/Bio-Terrorism On An Indigenous Navajo American Reservation~
~This is an article I wish to share, written by another, unlike all of my other blogs, but never the less powerful in bringing about awareness of an issue that has been, and still is, all to common in the United States on tribal lands. It is an issue of Government sanctioned eco-and-bio-terrorism which has cost and continues to cost countless, unreported, Indigenous American lives from numerous tribal reservations and Indigenous/Native American communities. Just like the Navajo communities spoken of in this article below...
~
~
For The Navajo Nation, Uranium Mining's Deadly a legacy that poisons the land and it will never go away, which lingers from one generation to the next generation.
The federal government is cleaning up a long legacy of uranium mining within the Navajo Nation — some 27,000 square miles spread across Utah, New Mexico and Arizona that is home to more than 250,000 people.
Many Navajo people have died of kidney failure and cancer, conditions linked to uranium contamination. And new research from the CDC shows uranium in babies born now.
Mining companies blasted 4 million tons of uranium out of Navajo land between 1944 and 1986. The federal government purchased the ore to make atomic weapons. As the Cold War threat petered out the companies left, abandoning more than 500 mines.
Many Navajo unwittingly let their livestock drink from those pools, and their children play in mine debris piles. Some even built their homes out of uranium.
"Flint (Michigan) might feel really far away from the Navajo Nation in rural Arizona. But when you look at the demographics of it, it really isn't," he says. "This is a community that has found themselves voiceless."
A sign at the old Kerr-McGee uranium mill site in Grants, N.M., warns of radioactive material. This week, the Justice Department announced a $5 billion settlement against the mining company to pay for the cleanup of toxic sites the company left across the U.S. over a period of more than eight decades.
~Navajo Nation Farmers Feel The Weight Of Colorado Mine Spill~
The U.S. Justice Department has recently gone after some of the mining companies. Since 2008, the Environmental Protection Agency has hauled away thousands of cubic yards of mine waste and has rebuilt nearly 50 contaminated homes, says EPA Regional Administrator Jared Blumenfeld. But there's still much more to be done.
One company, Anadarko Petroleum, and its subsidiary Kerr-McGee recently paid $1 billion to the Navajo Nation for cleanup and as compensation to people living with the effects of uranium contamination.
But one-third of the mining companies have shut down or have run out of money. The federal government knew about some of the dangers decades ago, but only started the cleanup in recent years.
And the uranium issue on the Navajo Nation is part of a much bigger problem. Across the western United States there are more than 160,000 abandoned hard rock mines — thousands of which continue to pollute.
Since 2006 prices for Uranium ore has been climbing and now the mines are back and they want to take more Uranium from the land and the South West Tribes oppose these advances to pick up where the mines left off.
The Legacy of Uranium in Northern Arizona is three Superfund Clean Ups, two in Tuba City, the Rare Metals Mill and the AEC Ore Buying Station (stockpiled uranium ore from other sites for processing) and the Monument Valley Mill site, the New Mexico Tumor Registry is providing information on clusters of cancers, many premature deaths of Uranium Miners many with lung cancers and still decades of study and little action.
Many Navajo people have died of kidney failure and cancer, conditions linked to uranium contamination. And new research from the CDC shows uranium in babies born now.
Mining companies blasted 4 million tons of uranium out of Navajo land between 1944 and 1986. The federal government purchased the ore to make atomic weapons. As the Cold War threat petered out the companies left, abandoning more than 500 mines.
Many Navajo unwittingly let their livestock drink from those pools, and their children play in mine debris piles. Some even built their homes out of uranium.
"Flint (Michigan) might feel really far away from the Navajo Nation in rural Arizona. But when you look at the demographics of it, it really isn't," he says. "This is a community that has found themselves voiceless."
A sign at the old Kerr-McGee uranium mill site in Grants, N.M., warns of radioactive material. This week, the Justice Department announced a $5 billion settlement against the mining company to pay for the cleanup of toxic sites the company left across the U.S. over a period of more than eight decades.
~Navajo Nation Farmers Feel The Weight Of Colorado Mine Spill~
The U.S. Justice Department has recently gone after some of the mining companies. Since 2008, the Environmental Protection Agency has hauled away thousands of cubic yards of mine waste and has rebuilt nearly 50 contaminated homes, says EPA Regional Administrator Jared Blumenfeld. But there's still much more to be done.
One company, Anadarko Petroleum, and its subsidiary Kerr-McGee recently paid $1 billion to the Navajo Nation for cleanup and as compensation to people living with the effects of uranium contamination.
But one-third of the mining companies have shut down or have run out of money. The federal government knew about some of the dangers decades ago, but only started the cleanup in recent years.
And the uranium issue on the Navajo Nation is part of a much bigger problem. Across the western United States there are more than 160,000 abandoned hard rock mines — thousands of which continue to pollute.
Since 2006 prices for Uranium ore has been climbing and now the mines are back and they want to take more Uranium from the land and the South West Tribes oppose these advances to pick up where the mines left off.
The Legacy of Uranium in Northern Arizona is three Superfund Clean Ups, two in Tuba City, the Rare Metals Mill and the AEC Ore Buying Station (stockpiled uranium ore from other sites for processing) and the Monument Valley Mill site, the New Mexico Tumor Registry is providing information on clusters of cancers, many premature deaths of Uranium Miners many with lung cancers and still decades of study and little action.
Saturday, March 22, 2014
Government Backed, Corporate, Eco-Terrorism Is Becoming Epidemic
DESPITE BEING INVESTIGATE BY THE FEDS FOR CRIMINAL CHARGES, DUKE ENERGY CONTINUES TO POLLUTE RELEASING TOXIC COAL ASH INTO CAPE FEAR RIVER IN NORTH CAROLINA. ht...tp://twitpic.com/dywgl7 #GOVERNOR #NORTHCAROLINA #DUKEENERGY #COALASHSPILL #DANRIVER #DENR #WATERKEEPERALLIANCE #TOXIC #CANCER #POLLUTION #FRACKING #ELSIPOGTOG #FASCISM #NAZI #HITLERHARPER #FRAUD #CORRUPT #GREED #HYPOCRITE #SATAN #EVIL #HARPERISADICK #HARPERSUCKMOOSEBALLS #HARPERNOMORE #TREAYSEVEN #STOPHARPER #STOPREDFORD #LIES #NOFRACKING #NOTARSANDS #NOKXL #STOPKXL
-via Michael Bean & EcoWatch
Breaking: Duke Energy Caught Dumping Wastewater from Coal Ash Lagoon Into Local Watershed
Waterkeeper Alliance released aerial surveillance photos taken from a fixed-wing aircraft last week which show Duke Energy workers pumping wastewater from two of Duke Energy’s toxic coal ash lagoons into a canal that drains into the Cape Fear River.
The revelation comes less than two months after the Dan River disaster, where at least 30,000 tons of coal ash spilled from another of Duke Energy’s toxic coal ash lagoons. The pumping also came just days before a federal grand jury convenes in Raleigh to hear evidence in a criminal investigation of Duke Energy, the North Carolina Dept. of Environment and Natural Resources (DENR) and the handling of coal ash.
In these revealing stories in Sunday’s New York Times and Monday’s Los Angeles Times, Duke Energy admitted its workers were pumping coal ash wastewater out of a toxic wastewater pond and into a canal which drains into the Cape Fear River. The Cape Fear River is a source of public drinking water for residents in Fayetteville, Sanford, Dunn, Harnett County, Fort Bragg and Wilmington.
Even more startling, Duke Energy described the pumping of coal ash wastewater into a watershed as part of “routine maintenance.” The New York Times quoted Duke Energy spokesman Jeff Brooks as saying: “They’re lowering the water to conduct the maintenance they need to.” According to the New York Times, Duke claims it notified state regulators—a claim that was contradicted by officials with DENR...Duke Energy cannot lawfully discharge any pollutant to a waterway without a proper permit in place.
“To label the secret, unmitigated, intentional discharge of untold amounts of highly toxic wastewater as ‘routine maintenance’ seems ludicrous,” said Peter Harrison of the Waterkeeper Alliance. “Here, Duke Energy has admitted that it deliberately emptied the contents of its ash ponds into the Cape Fear River watershed, just weeks after decimating at least 70 miles of the Dan River with its coal ash, and just days before it will appear in front of a federal grand jury for its suspected criminal activity related to its coal ash.”
DENR has indicated that Duke did not notify the agency prior to pumping the ponds, and that regulators noticed the pumping during a site visit on an unspecified day last week. “If DENR did not authorize Duke’s pumping, it would show an appalling disregard for the law and the welfare of North Carolinians,” Harrison added.
Cape Fear Riverkeeper Kemp Burdette said, “I am gravely concerned that neither Duke nor DENR gave any public notice that untold gallons of concentrated untreated coal ash waste was deliberately dumped into the Cape Fear watershed. Hundreds of thousands of North Carolinians rely on the Cape Fear river for drinking water, fishing and swimming. We do not want heavy metals from coal ash in our river.”
Waterkeeper Alliance Global Coal Campaign Coordinator Donna Lisenby said, “Duke never obtained an official modification of its NPDES permit to allow the discharge the highly concentrated coal ash waste water from the bottom of their ponds into the Cape Fear river watershed—if it had happened through open channels, the public would have had a chance to object. This was either illegal, unilateral action by Duke—or a quiet backroom deal with DENR. There is no evidence that any valid, publicly available permit allows them to discharge untold gallons of untreated concentrated coal ash waste water. Duke Energy should provide the specific language from the permit they claim allowed them to discharge highly concentrated untreated coal ash waste water into a standing body of water with almost no flow to dilute it.”
CONTINUES HERE -
http://ecowatch.com/2014/03/17/duke-energy-coal-ash/
Now the author of this blog would like to pose a question to yet another report of blatant and unlawful corporate terrorism. A question in the irony of what is considered justifiable as counter-terrorism operations:
What would they say if patriots determined to 'defend their country' began engaging in a war of attrition against these 'Terrorists'?
Would the homeland security warriors be declared the terrorists, in a political spin to make the real terrorists appear the innocent victims?
If Al Qaeda was dumping lethal chemicals into our drinking water the military would send counter-terror units to neutralize & assassinate such terrorists...
However a wealthy corporation w/political support bought w/bribes can engage in same terrorism and it's 'legal'. Anyone who opposes them is labeled the 'Terrorists'.
So when is it justifiable to engage in guerrilla warfare tactics the way the European-American colonists did against the British, which so many today propagate as heroism?
When is it justifiable, only after their is so little fresh drinking water left that we must engage in war over water rights in order to survive?Or is it justifiable before it comes to that?
Would they engage in such behavior in Afghanistan where IEDs & Pashtu snipers would await them at every phase of their eco/human rights terrorist activity?
When does it become justifiable for patriotic citizens to follow in the footsteps of the American colonists who raised up arms to liberate themselves from government tyranny and oppression?
When does it become justifiable for patriotic citizens who value their innate human rights and the rights of their children to have protected, life giving, drinking water and healthy, food producing, soil that sustains all life on this planet?
When is it justifiable to take up heroic arms against such terrorism which seriously threatens our survivability and effects everyone who relies upon clean drinking water and soil capable of bearing food?
We hear them claim that their corporate actions provide lucrative jobs to families and thereby is vital to the economy. But can we eat and drink the money which they seem to sow readily in order to facilitate their terrorist activities once the water is undrinkable, the soil will no longer bear fruit, vegetables, grains, or grasses for our livestock to graze?
If their actions are threatening the very existence of 'all' people and future generations then does not this constitute terrorism? Even more so, is it not global terrorism?
Because they have the money to buy political support for their terrorist activities and those political powers have the authority of law enforcement agencies at their disposal does that mean that anyone whom opposes them is 'really' the criminals or the terrorists?
Here is a thought...Had the British defeated the English-American colonists George Washington would not have gone down in history books as a patriotic hero but would have been hanged as a traitor to the British Army and a rebel insurgent leader. And the history books would remember him as nothing more than a leader of a guerilla rebel insurrection against the British crown.
We know that semantics play a huge roll in the way governments write and enforce laws, particularly speaking when we are speaking of a corrupt government involved in machinating schemes for the love of material wealth and the increased political and military might which that affords.
Do such semantics play powerful role in controlling the way the populace views what is morally justifiable and unjustifiable in terms of survival? Do we allow such semantics to control what we deem as justifiable in terms of self-defense, defense of our children, and defense of our countries' life sustaining capabilities? Our land's water and food bearing capabilities?
Are not such things worthy of protecting and fighting, even dying, for? Without them will we not meet death anyway?
And would going to war against such terrorism prevent a more massive civil war in the future when there is not enough suitable drinking water and food bearing land that the people will be forced to engage in horrific civil wars in order to simply survive?
Is it justifiable to engage in asymmetric warfare against the entities and their operations responsible for these terroristic activities earlier on in order to save multitudes of human lives later on when the full fruition of their destructive activities has left the masses at an impasse to survival?
Is it justifiable to act as patriots in the defense of not one's national pride but for the survival of one's country, one's community, one's family, one's children, ones future? All of which whom face immediate threat to their future survival.
Such political powers and their corporate terrorist masters are all too happy to keep the masses distracted with escapism in the form of frivolous television shows, social internet sites, propaganda media, video games, opulent consumerism, and vice.
Just as a clever slight of hand artist or confidence artist distracts his victims into looking one direction while he deceives them in the other, so do these politically backed corporate terrorists who destroy the very life sustaining water and soil that we as the people 'must' protect in order to survive! In order for our children to survive!
So again I ask myself and the people when is it justifiable to fight against such tyranny and terrorism when time and time again we witness that they do not honor the laws of the land, of the courts, and seem to operate above the law? When they thumb their noses at the constitutional rights of the people, the innate rights of all human beings, at the ruling of any reasonable authorities, and demonstrate a blatant disregard for 'Life' itself...
When is it enough and when is it right for the people to act when civil courts have proven impotent against such lawless and politically influential terrorists against the human race?
I ask myself and my fellow conscientious human beings when?
AnDrew*
-via Michael Bean & EcoWatch
Breaking: Duke Energy Caught Dumping Wastewater from Coal Ash Lagoon Into Local Watershed
Waterkeeper Alliance released aerial surveillance photos taken from a fixed-wing aircraft last week which show Duke Energy workers pumping wastewater from two of Duke Energy’s toxic coal ash lagoons into a canal that drains into the Cape Fear River.
The revelation comes less than two months after the Dan River disaster, where at least 30,000 tons of coal ash spilled from another of Duke Energy’s toxic coal ash lagoons. The pumping also came just days before a federal grand jury convenes in Raleigh to hear evidence in a criminal investigation of Duke Energy, the North Carolina Dept. of Environment and Natural Resources (DENR) and the handling of coal ash.
In these revealing stories in Sunday’s New York Times and Monday’s Los Angeles Times, Duke Energy admitted its workers were pumping coal ash wastewater out of a toxic wastewater pond and into a canal which drains into the Cape Fear River. The Cape Fear River is a source of public drinking water for residents in Fayetteville, Sanford, Dunn, Harnett County, Fort Bragg and Wilmington.
Even more startling, Duke Energy described the pumping of coal ash wastewater into a watershed as part of “routine maintenance.” The New York Times quoted Duke Energy spokesman Jeff Brooks as saying: “They’re lowering the water to conduct the maintenance they need to.” According to the New York Times, Duke claims it notified state regulators—a claim that was contradicted by officials with DENR...Duke Energy cannot lawfully discharge any pollutant to a waterway without a proper permit in place.
“To label the secret, unmitigated, intentional discharge of untold amounts of highly toxic wastewater as ‘routine maintenance’ seems ludicrous,” said Peter Harrison of the Waterkeeper Alliance. “Here, Duke Energy has admitted that it deliberately emptied the contents of its ash ponds into the Cape Fear River watershed, just weeks after decimating at least 70 miles of the Dan River with its coal ash, and just days before it will appear in front of a federal grand jury for its suspected criminal activity related to its coal ash.”
DENR has indicated that Duke did not notify the agency prior to pumping the ponds, and that regulators noticed the pumping during a site visit on an unspecified day last week. “If DENR did not authorize Duke’s pumping, it would show an appalling disregard for the law and the welfare of North Carolinians,” Harrison added.
Cape Fear Riverkeeper Kemp Burdette said, “I am gravely concerned that neither Duke nor DENR gave any public notice that untold gallons of concentrated untreated coal ash waste was deliberately dumped into the Cape Fear watershed. Hundreds of thousands of North Carolinians rely on the Cape Fear river for drinking water, fishing and swimming. We do not want heavy metals from coal ash in our river.”
Waterkeeper Alliance Global Coal Campaign Coordinator Donna Lisenby said, “Duke never obtained an official modification of its NPDES permit to allow the discharge the highly concentrated coal ash waste water from the bottom of their ponds into the Cape Fear river watershed—if it had happened through open channels, the public would have had a chance to object. This was either illegal, unilateral action by Duke—or a quiet backroom deal with DENR. There is no evidence that any valid, publicly available permit allows them to discharge untold gallons of untreated concentrated coal ash waste water. Duke Energy should provide the specific language from the permit they claim allowed them to discharge highly concentrated untreated coal ash waste water into a standing body of water with almost no flow to dilute it.”
CONTINUES HERE -
http://ecowatch.com/2014/03/17/duke-energy-coal-ash/
Now the author of this blog would like to pose a question to yet another report of blatant and unlawful corporate terrorism. A question in the irony of what is considered justifiable as counter-terrorism operations:
What would they say if patriots determined to 'defend their country' began engaging in a war of attrition against these 'Terrorists'?
Would the homeland security warriors be declared the terrorists, in a political spin to make the real terrorists appear the innocent victims?
If Al Qaeda was dumping lethal chemicals into our drinking water the military would send counter-terror units to neutralize & assassinate such terrorists...
However a wealthy corporation w/political support bought w/bribes can engage in same terrorism and it's 'legal'. Anyone who opposes them is labeled the 'Terrorists'.
So when is it justifiable to engage in guerrilla warfare tactics the way the European-American colonists did against the British, which so many today propagate as heroism?
When is it justifiable, only after their is so little fresh drinking water left that we must engage in war over water rights in order to survive?Or is it justifiable before it comes to that?
Would they engage in such behavior in Afghanistan where IEDs & Pashtu snipers would await them at every phase of their eco/human rights terrorist activity?
When does it become justifiable for patriotic citizens to follow in the footsteps of the American colonists who raised up arms to liberate themselves from government tyranny and oppression?
When does it become justifiable for patriotic citizens who value their innate human rights and the rights of their children to have protected, life giving, drinking water and healthy, food producing, soil that sustains all life on this planet?
When is it justifiable to take up heroic arms against such terrorism which seriously threatens our survivability and effects everyone who relies upon clean drinking water and soil capable of bearing food?
We hear them claim that their corporate actions provide lucrative jobs to families and thereby is vital to the economy. But can we eat and drink the money which they seem to sow readily in order to facilitate their terrorist activities once the water is undrinkable, the soil will no longer bear fruit, vegetables, grains, or grasses for our livestock to graze?
If their actions are threatening the very existence of 'all' people and future generations then does not this constitute terrorism? Even more so, is it not global terrorism?
Because they have the money to buy political support for their terrorist activities and those political powers have the authority of law enforcement agencies at their disposal does that mean that anyone whom opposes them is 'really' the criminals or the terrorists?
Here is a thought...Had the British defeated the English-American colonists George Washington would not have gone down in history books as a patriotic hero but would have been hanged as a traitor to the British Army and a rebel insurgent leader. And the history books would remember him as nothing more than a leader of a guerilla rebel insurrection against the British crown.
We know that semantics play a huge roll in the way governments write and enforce laws, particularly speaking when we are speaking of a corrupt government involved in machinating schemes for the love of material wealth and the increased political and military might which that affords.
Do such semantics play powerful role in controlling the way the populace views what is morally justifiable and unjustifiable in terms of survival? Do we allow such semantics to control what we deem as justifiable in terms of self-defense, defense of our children, and defense of our countries' life sustaining capabilities? Our land's water and food bearing capabilities?
Are not such things worthy of protecting and fighting, even dying, for? Without them will we not meet death anyway?
And would going to war against such terrorism prevent a more massive civil war in the future when there is not enough suitable drinking water and food bearing land that the people will be forced to engage in horrific civil wars in order to simply survive?
Is it justifiable to engage in asymmetric warfare against the entities and their operations responsible for these terroristic activities earlier on in order to save multitudes of human lives later on when the full fruition of their destructive activities has left the masses at an impasse to survival?
Is it justifiable to act as patriots in the defense of not one's national pride but for the survival of one's country, one's community, one's family, one's children, ones future? All of which whom face immediate threat to their future survival.
Such political powers and their corporate terrorist masters are all too happy to keep the masses distracted with escapism in the form of frivolous television shows, social internet sites, propaganda media, video games, opulent consumerism, and vice.
Just as a clever slight of hand artist or confidence artist distracts his victims into looking one direction while he deceives them in the other, so do these politically backed corporate terrorists who destroy the very life sustaining water and soil that we as the people 'must' protect in order to survive! In order for our children to survive!
So again I ask myself and the people when is it justifiable to fight against such tyranny and terrorism when time and time again we witness that they do not honor the laws of the land, of the courts, and seem to operate above the law? When they thumb their noses at the constitutional rights of the people, the innate rights of all human beings, at the ruling of any reasonable authorities, and demonstrate a blatant disregard for 'Life' itself...
When is it enough and when is it right for the people to act when civil courts have proven impotent against such lawless and politically influential terrorists against the human race?
I ask myself and my fellow conscientious human beings when?
AnDrew*
Friday, October 18, 2013
Corporate/Gov. Human Rights Violations And Eco-terrorism Threatening Humanity.
We live under the illusion of freedom and human rights. In fact corporate ran Gov. demonstrates on a
daily basis all over the country and all over the world that they value not innate human rights or the
ecosystem which all life needs to survive but rather they value only money and political power! They
pervert the judicial system, ecosystem, and our innate rights given unto us by our Creator to feed a
lust for money and political power that will not fill their bellies once the water is no longer drinkable,
the soil will no longer produce food, and the air will no longer be breathable!
Authority is suppose to be the voice of reason but what happens when that authority acts
unreasonable!?
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)



