ANTI-GUN LAWS IN THE U.S. FOR PRIVATE CITIZENS.

      Outlawing private citizens from legally owning firearms in the U.S. is not meant to protect citizens from criminal violence but is an attempt by a government entity with machinatious plans to 'de-fang' it's citizens before it can safely reveal the totalitarian face that it hides from it's people behind the mask of democracy.
     We can see by statistics and through reports of citizens in the U.K. that home invasion crimes skyrocketed after private citizens were ordered to turn over all of their legally owned firearms to the police and government agencies. Recent events in the city of Boston Masachussetts, where they have some of the strictest gun laws within the U.S., show that stricter gun laws do not protect the good citizens of a state or country. If anything it only emboldens the terrorists and criminals with the confidence that they can walk around without trepidation and confidently shoot our citizens, like fish in a barrel, without fear of being shot back at by any of their victims. I can tell you that passing anti-'anything' laws does not give the citizens more security and our government knows this.
     Criminals will always find a way to obtain what it is that they want while only the law abiding citizens will be the ones without it. We've outlawed cocaine yet we have the largest cocaine epidemic in the world! We outlawed all illegal drugs and yet we have a country infested with a major drug epidemic and a large gangster subculture that makes no attempt to hide it's face but is celibrated in hip hop/gangsta rap music, gangsta films, urban culture, and in various other forms of media in the U.S.. So do we believe that criminals will be unarmed by passing anti-gun laws for private citizens? Of course not! Therefore what could be the government's true motive for such a push against the 2nd ammendment?
    Whatever it is that is being planned behind closed doors with secret handshakes and machinatious aforethought requires that the government first 'de-fang' it's private citizens so that future rebellions may be squashed with relative ease. They can't afford another revolutionary war against a totalitarian government presence, as the english colonists and their allies fought against the british during the American Revolutionary War. And whatever it is that they have planned causes them to believe that they will be met with stiff resistance from the citizens. So first they must disarm them: 'de-fang' their citizens. Only then can it remove the mask of democracy to reveal it's totalitarian face.
     May we awaken from our slumber and shake off the haze from our eyes to see what is 'behind' what is being said rather than focusing upon only the prevaricative words of those who would have you remain engrossed in the mundane and frivolous as they work to re-create a new world without the hinderences of such archaic things as The U.S. Constitutional Rights of the People.
    The constitution was written to protect the People from totalitarianism and governmental oppression of the people. The people are to control the government and not the other way around. But the government believes that the people are the sheep and the government is the shepard.       The sheep do not know what is good for them therefore the shepard will rule the sheep and tend to their needs if only the sheep will blindly follow. And the one's that wander or rebel against the shepard, he does not carry his rod and his staff in vain. 

      For those who don't think the government would never be so machinatious, just close your eyes and go back to sleep and Uncle Sam will bring you lots of presents.

     "Govern me harder daddy", seems to be the mantra of the masses whom cry out for Democratic-Socialist Tyranny, Transnational Corporate Globalism as well as those whom desire Communism. 

       
            HOO-AH 4 LIFE.