Friday, June 2, 2017

***WHAT IS A CHOKE HOLD/ WHAT IS A STRANGLE HOLD?***


 ~MMA guys sometimes think the Gracies invented Jujutsu or Judo newaza and that the terminology used in BJJ and MMA is gospel but all of the techniques have been around for centuries prior to Gracie Newaza (B.J.J.) and have had different names depending upon whether the terms came from Catch Wrestling, Hook Wrestling, Kano Jujutsu/Judo, etc.

~I'd like to address the fact that what the MMA community and it's spectator fanatics (fans) refer to as a rear-naked-CHOKE isn't a choke at all but a 'strangle' hold. When I was a young boy, before the Gracies were popularized by UFC I-V we were taught that this hold was called a 'Sleeper-Hold' and we practiced it on each other when parents weren't around but we let go when they felt like they were going to pass out and tapped.
 
~My mother was raised a military brat with a brother in law enforcement and she was familiar with the 'sleeper-hold' and how to apply it with or without clothing in the early 80s.

~When I began studying and training I learned that a 'strangle' hold aka 'sleeper hold' is one that restricts blood flow while a 'choke' hold restricts air flow. Fast foward to the UFC era and the Gracies, whose first language was not English, began incorrectly refering to a strangle as a choke.
 
~To further differentiate, what the MMA and Gracie family incorrectly refers to as a rear 'naked' CHOKE is actually a rear 'figure-four' or rear 'interlocking' STRANGLE/SLEEPER-HOLD which attacks vascular blood flow but not air flow.
 
~A naked choke is applied with the naked forearm across the trachea, applying pressure with the radial bone against the trachea with the hands clasped together in a mutual grip.

 This is very lethal and can not really be safely practiced under full contact. 

It's also illegal under most police department guidelines because so many cops have accidentally killed resisting suspects with the 'naked-choke'. 

The same 'choke' can be applied using the interlocking or figure-four configuration, which is a much stronger hold and more difficult to escape because the fingers grip the bicep and are then locked by the forearm while the other hand is hidden behind the target's head or neck. 

The push and pull of the interlocking or figure-four configuration generates more power into either a choke (air) or a strangle (blood).
 
~The technique which you see or practice in MMA, Gracie Jiu-Jitsu (ne-waza), Judo, Sambo or what the U.S. police refer to as the Vascular Neck Restraint is not a naked 'choke' at all but a 'strangle' applied with an interlocking (figure-four) hold. The elbow is placed directly under the target's chin which positions the bicep of one arm and the radial bone of the other arm on each side of their neck while the opposite arm pushes their head forward into the strangle. 

THIS STRANGLE, WHEN RELEASED IMMEDIATELY AFTER THE DESIRED EFFECT, IS MUCH SAFER THAN A CHOKE SO THAT IS WHY IT'S PERMITED IN BOTH COMBAT SPORTS, SECURITY AND IN LAW ENFORCEMENT.
 
~So the reason why it's important to understand the difference between a choke and a strangle is both for technical reasons and for legalities.

 MMA and the Brazilian Portuguese speaking Gracies have given new names, often incorrectly, to old techniques that have been around for centuries but for legal, medical and combative reasons it's most important to understand the difference between a strangle (blood restriction) and a choke (air restriction).

~For those whom don't trust my expertise as much as they trust the internet I'll include a third party reference that backs up what I've presented.
 
Peace be with you and remain HOO-AH,
AnDrew

** Strangling - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
"In some martial arts (such as Judo) a distinction is made between a strangle, which interferes with the flow of blood to the brain , and a choke, which interferes with the airway. Depending on the particular method of strangulation, one or several of these typically occur in combination; however, vascular obstruction is usually the main mechanism.[4] Complete obstruction of blood flow to the brain is associated with irreversible neurological damage and death,[5] but during strangulation there is still unimpeded blood flow in the vertebral arteries.[6] Estimates have been made that significant occlusion of the carotid arteries and jugular veins occurs with a pressure of around 3.4 N/cm², while the trachea demands six times more at approximately 22 N/cm².[7] As in all cases of strangulation, the rapidity of death can be affected by the susceptibility to carotid sinus stimulation.[4] Carotid sinus reflex death is sometimes considered a mechanism of death in cases of strangulation, but it remains highly disputed.[3][8] The reported time from application to unconsciousness varies from 7-14 seconds if effectively applied [9] to one minute in other cases, with death occurring minutes after unconsciousness.[3]"
Read more: http://www.city-data.com/…/897904-difference-between-chokin…
 "Judo is a study of techniques with which you may kill if you wish to kill, injure if you wish to injure, subdue if you wish to subdue, and, when attacked, defend yourself."- Jigoro Kano.

Thursday, May 18, 2017

Debating Honestly In The Sincere Pursuit Of Unadulterated Truth

~There are many wolves in sheep clothing and even Satan masquerades as an angel of light in order to deceive the masses. ~Beloved, do not believe every spirit, but test the spirits, whether they are of God; because many false prophets have gone out into the world.
~(This is why we must analyze the teachings/doctrine of the faith or religion and the life of the messiah and/or prophet rather than analyze the conduct and character of those whom would fly the flag).
~When our acquaintances bring up the crimes of individuals in history whom flew the flag of a specific faith or religion we must examine not the individuals or their organization but rather the doctrine/teachings of the actual faith according to it's founder/prophet/or messiah, in addition to examining the conduct and character of the correlating founder/prophet/or messiah.
~Do the conduct and character of those individuals or organizations coincide with the teachings/doctrine of the faith/religion as it is taught by the founder/prophet/or Messiah?
~Does the conduct and character of the individuals or organization attempt to emulate the conduct and character of their faith/religion's founder/prophet/or Messiah?
~If Islamic Jihadi display conduct and character that is in emulation of their prophet Muhammed and the undadulterated doctrine of Islam (as taught from the Quran, the Hadith and the Sunna) than we can surmise that they are indeed true Muslims and their practice is representative of Muhammed and Islam.
~If the Roman Vatican during the Dark Ages and the Inquisitions or the K.K.K. after the American Civil War displayed conduct and character that is in emulation of the Messiah Christ Jesus and follows the unadulterated doctrine of Christ Jesus' gospel than we can surmise whether they too were (or actually were not) disciples of Christ Jesus (Christians) or merely wolves in sheep clothing operating under a false flag.
~This is where cold, unemotional, logic and reason must always fuel any debate. And well researched facts must be presented without any room for opinion, hearsay, emotional provocations or straw-man arguments. Debating must be about seeking and understanding truths, weighing all of the evidence and then accepting the evidence even when it goes against our preconcieved notions and prejudices.
~But in the end do we really want unadulterated 'truth' or are we looking and hoping for justification for our own desires and possibly the deconstruction of our opponent's desires? If so than own it and accept within yourself that this is who you are but don't decieve yourself into believing that unadulterated truth is what you seek.
~Every good lie possesses truth, just as rat poison is predominantly composed of food lest the rat wouldn't be enticed to consume it. But in a world with so many diametrically opposing truths which one is the unadulterated truth?
~That question is what sent me on a journey that took me well over a decade of nearly full time research and immersion into various spiritual paths and religions to undoubtable discover for myself. Now I understand that Jesus Christ didn't bring 'religion' to the world. The world had enough religions. He brought true spirituality, personal connection to our Creator through the Holy Spirit and by the blood of His altruistic sacrifice for the reconciliation of all mankind and propitiation for sin. But mankind, under the influence of darkness in their hearts, hijacked this pure Spirituality and reinstituted the priesthood for power, control and the love of wealth. The very things which Christ Jesus chastized the Jewish priesthood in Judea for and which He did away with.
~ There's been much deception and the gospel has been hijacked by those whom would rule the earth by threat, force or fraud while operating under a false-flag. It has been hijacked also by those whom have turned the Creator (God) into an investment banker by taking the universal law of reaping and sowing to incorporate ancient sympathetic magic practices with the doctrine of the gospel of Christ Jesus...because many false prophets have gone out into the world.
~Remain sincere in your altruistic search for unadulterated truth and the truth will come to you.
Hoo-ah,
AnDrew
18May2017

Tuesday, May 9, 2017

*Concerning Filipino Knife Guros and Psuedo Knife-Fighting Experts*

*Concerning Filipino Knife Guros and Pseudo Knife-Fighting Experts*

  ~When I was a teenager in high school my older (honestly frightening) cousin spent most of his life in Louisiana prisons before coming to live with us in Texas for a year. He got a job working nights at a small biker bar across the border in Louisiana as a bouncer. The favorite past time there for the 1%ers (criminal biker gangsters) was knife duels, playing til someone draws blood, using hunting knives and combat knives. My cousin was undefeated in that game. He once came home with another man's long pony tail sewn to  the back of his military patrol cap and said that he'd won it in a knife fight/duel.
~Once he returned home with the first digit on his index finger cut to the bone, where a 1%biker's buddies held him down and attempted to cut off his first joint on his trigger finger after he went too far in a knife fight. He had to learn to shoot a rifle with his middle finger after that since it no longer bent after it healed.
~He and I sparred all the time with metal butter knives while he taught me his craft. As a devout practitioner of boxing from a young age I was faster than he until he insisted that we use thin, plastic handle, paring knives. That's when I learned the reality of getting cut and that the fear of getting stabbed or cut changes EVERYTHING in how I moved, attacked, counter-attacked and what I was no longer willing to leave hanging out there. After the initial cut or jab into the hand my body instinctively began to be much more cautious and the idea of trying to disarm his weapon hand or even to grab it (him being much stronger than I at the time) seemed like a good way to injure my hand or fingers.
  ~FMA guys should train this way, with live blades sometimes. 1% biker gangsters compete with hunting knives and sometimes suffer severe injuries. Arguably we can all question the prudence of this but then how else can one earn the experience necessary to be considered a 'knife-fighting' expert/master/guro/instructor?
~Such men as 1% gangster bikers engaging in underground knife duels and some prison convicts have more real-experience than these lucrative FMA Guros practicing ego-masturbation. Yet the uninitiated and naïve pay exorbitant amounts of money to train under the inexperienced 'artists' whom fly the false flag of 'Expert'. I say this as one whom is trained and still practice FMA Escrima (among other methods), so I'm not prejudice against all Filipino Martial Arts. I'm merely addressing the dishonesty of the pseudo-'experts' whom teach imprudent, suicidal, methods while flying the false flag of 'knife-fighting-expert'.
~Imagine if medical students studied surgery under a medical professor whom never performed a single successful surgery in his or her life? Would it be accurate to call such a professor a 'master' or 'expert' of surgery? 

~There seems to be too much LARPING in the martial arts community concerning knife vs. knife tactics and unarmed defenses vs. knife and it's being lucratively peddled to the naïve as viable self-defense or life insurance. If LARPING in the martial arts is what people enjoy about training than there's no harm in that but not when one espouses to be a self-defense expert and promotes suicidal tactics to the naïve, trusting and paying 'customer' (I'll refrain from calling them a student of such individuals) whom believes to be investing in what amounts to life-insurance should they ever suffer the misfortune of facing a bladed predatory criminal in a life or death attack.
~If you can't pull off the techniques you're peddling as self-defense or close-combat defense while competitively sparring with shock knives or even training knives with lip stick on them than you're not keeping your instruction honest. And there are no acceptable exchanges in a fight with a knife.
~The only instructor I've seen teaching honest knife vs. knife methods to the public is a man named Robert Redfeather. I'm not referring to instructors whom teach the bolo or machete, which is of a different nature, that the FMA instructors excel at in their respective arts. And the only instructor that I've seen teaching honest empty hand defenses against a knife to the public is a man named Itay Gil of Protect Krav-Maga / Protect Israeli Security Solutions
~To be quite frank, prospective students will learn more about knife combat reading and practicing from the pages of the book, Put Em Down Take Em Out: Knife Fighting Techniques from Folsom Prison by Dan Pentecost than one would paying their hard earned salary to most of the self-proclaimed 'knife-fighting experts' and attending expensive seminars on tactical knife fighting/knife defenses.   
 ~And before we close I'd like to comment how many of these pseudo knife-fighting experts, whom have never been in a knife fight nor survived a knife assault using their art, would have you convinced that you need to purchase their ridiculously expensive 'tactical' folder or neck-knife to be properly prepared to defend your life from the next raging rapist, kidnapper or knife wielding Jihadi. Yet I'd wager that more men are removed from circulation with cheap blades, home made shivs, kitchen knives, ice picks, screw drivers and farming blades than with expensive or custom made tactical fighting knives. So if your purpose is for self-defense, as opposed to owning a beautiful, custom, knife for personal reasons, than a cheap fruit knife will gut, maim, cripple or bleed a man out just as well as a custom tactical folder. And you wont mind using it as a throw away after whereas you'd be hard pressed to toss a $100.00 USD tactical folder that you sacrificed for several months to purchase or were given as a gift for your birthday by your love one. Professional criminals keep it simple and so should you if your intent is upon being armed for the purpose of self-defense and survival as opposed to feeding the ego and fantasy. 

~The mind is the greatest weapon and the undying will often supersedes the skill...That being said, acquire realistic skill as opposed to LARPING and ego masturbation. Don't measure an instructor's worth by how good of a business man he is or how renowned he's become by force of charisma and how many YouTube videos they or their circle have published to grow the fame of their business. A clever marketer, charismatic personality or large fan base doesn't mean that they know about the business of criminal violence, surviving violence and have personal experience with using the skills that they're selling to the public in life or death situations. 
~Realize also that Infantry or Special Operations veterans and war veterans engage in battle with firearms and other projectile weapons or demolitions. It's extremely rare to engage the enemy with tactical knives or combat knives, so just because an instructor has an impressive military background doesn't mean they're any more of a 'knife-expert' than any other 31 flavors guro or combatives instructor on the market. It's a business for many and a very lucrative business for some, selling machismo to naïve men and women, so stating the reality of the situation is neither popular nor received well by those in the aforementioned business. But it needs to be said because the truth will set many free and hopefully save some naïve soul's life. If you're looking for security don't invest precious years, sweat and a king's ransom in emulating a paper tiger and think that it's enough to deter the criminal sadists or suicidal/homicidal Jihadi whom may or may not ever target you and your family. You don't always get what you pay for so paying more doesn't always guarantee quality. Nor do teachers with grandiose titles and cult followings.          
Remain Hoo-ah,
AnDrew
9May2017

Wednesday, May 3, 2017

Reality Of Knife Defenses and Knife Disarms in Self-Defense/Martial Art Schools.

~One of the first 'murders' by stabbing that I witnessed was while I was exiting a building in Clifton Tennessee behind a small group of men when the last man in the group before me, a short older man who was a renown guitarist, was attacked by a larger, young, man wearing thick work gloves while the knifer's buddies pulled security for him in case anyone should jump in to help the older man.
~They were maybe 6-8 feet from me and the older man/guitarists, whom knew his attacker, was covering in a typical boxing cover/shell defense and yelling out, "Why are you hitting me Billy?" (the killer's name was William Grubb)
~My acquantance Tomas Amaya yelled at me to come back inside, behind the glass door, then pulled me from behind and shut the door until it was over. I was focused on the men pulling security, staring at 'me', in case they tried to engage me, so I didn't notice the ice pick in Billy's gloved right hand. It looked like another beating being given out by another thug/gangster/bully to a vulnerable target. ~After it was over, they walked away, the killer tossed the weapon into a drain nearby, and as we were walking out the older man aka 'guitar-man' collapsed on the pavement sidewalk.
~Men walked over him without any compassion, so I went to check on him, when Tomas Amaya yelled at me not to touch him (for police evidence reasons) but as a soldier my instinct was to offer first-aid. No one helped him, he hadn't been in a fist-fight nor was he merely being punched as he presumed when he called out, "Why are you hitting me Billy?" He was being stabbed as the killer attacked him like a trained boxer wearing work gloves, the weapon tied to his right hand so as not to be dropped during the attack (a common method used by experienced knifers, thugs, prison gangs).
~His injuries were mostly internal, very little external blood, and he died mainly from having both lungs punctured, as well as numerous other injuries. I notified the authorities that there was a man down as I walked to morning chow, so they could attend to his wounds but it was too late for him. He was dead. Thinking he was taking a common beating, until he collapsed and lay dying on the pavement sidewalk.
~That's one of numerous, similar, experiences but it always stands out most in my mind because he yelled, "Why are you hitting me Billy? I thought we were friends, what did I do to you?"
~The reason he was attacked was later told to me by one of the gangsters that stood security for the killer during the attack. It was because they had put several names in a hat of men to draw from but the killer decided he'd just attack the last man in the next group to come out of that particular building and it didn't matter that it was an acquaintance whom played guitar songs for him at his request. He requested a transfer out of C.C.A. custody but Mr. Maples refused to grant him one so he chose to go to the state maximum security facility in Nashville by killing someone.
~When I was young these things didn't bother me much. Now that I'm older I've grown sentimental in my age, my heart has grown softer and many of these memories now bring me much sorrow. There's nothing glamorous about violence or death. The way action movies promote violence and murder or the way fans glorify it as being part of one's manliness is foolishness. 
~In my experiences, which form my opinions, and having obsessively trained in the combat arts since I was a small child it's my personal belief that 99.9% of martial arts that teach knife defenses and knife disarms are ego masturbation being sold to the unsuspecting and inexperienced as life-insurance. Theoretical LARPING peddled by pseudo knife-fighting-experts whom have never been in a knife fight nor been attacked by a knife wielding, murderous, predator a day in their life.
~Most martial arts are 'sports' and dueling arts, simple as that. Real Self-Defense is wisdom, controlling ones emotions and one's mouth, avoidance, situational awareness, understanding/studying criminal tactics, escape and evasion. And perhaps most importantly, being respectful as we treat others the way we wish for them to treat us. These things are self-defense.
~If it comes to being attacked by an unsolicited criminal attacker or violent bully, because one either screwed up or failed to learn true self-defense, thus allowing oneself to get caught in a bad situation among bad people, then counter-attack with maiming and lethal intent. Cause you may never know whether their punching you or stabbing you while your trading punches and kicks with them...until you collapse. THERE ARE NO ACCEPTABLE EXCHANGES IN CLOSE-COMBAT.
~In the sporting ring you can cover, block with the elbow, use the Philly Shield, utilize evasive footwork in a spacious, level, dueling ring, etc.. But criminal violence is nothing like the sporting ring/cage. There is a huge difference in dueling in a sporting ring/cage with a referee there to protect you and criminal attacks executed with intent to maim or kill. 
~Weapons, whether you see them or not, are the preferred method of combat used by thugs, gangsters and violent people. But they will not brandish them and their buddies, mates or homies in the area will not let you see them either when they come to the defense of their own, should you find yourself in a dominant position during a violent engagement or self-defense situation.
~When is a fist fight just a fist fight and when is a knife attack just a knife attack? You most likely will not know until it's all over so do yourselves a favor, if it's at all possible in your career or lifestyle, and avoid violent altercations and places synonymous with violence. Unless your a police officer, corrections officer, door man at a night club/bar or active duty military personnel it is (usually) possible.
~Avoidance, situational awareness, escape and evasion are the best tools for defending against a knife attack for civilian martial artists, self-defense practitioners and law abiding citizens. For professional military and law enforcement officers they have weapons to deal with violent people and the legal authority to use those weapons, including deadly force, whereas most civilians do not retain that authority.
~To win without fighting is the mark of a true master in self-defense.
~Peace be with you,
AnDrew
3May2017


Sunday, January 22, 2017

Did Disciples of Christ Commit Genocide In The Americas Or Were They False Flag Operations By The Roman Vatican?


 ~When I hear or read people talk of 'Christian Genocides' against indigenous Nations it sounds like an oxymoron if we in fact define 'Christians' as 'followers/disciples of Christ-Jesus' (Y'e'shua').



~The term "Roman Vatican genocides" would be more accurate, historically (not Christian genocides)..In the beginning a Christian refered to one whom followed the UNADULTERATED teachings of Christ Y'e'shua (Jesus) and nowhere in HIS teaching...s does he condone violent conquest, slavery, murder, or genocide. He taught HIS followers to love one's neighbor as themself, do unto others as one would want others to do unto them, pray for one's enemies, do good to those that despitefully use you, and to practice compassionate love toward all people.
 



~Nor do the UNADULTERATED teachings of Christ Jesus coincide with the teachings, or historical practices, and atrocities of the Roman Vatican Catholic organization and their Jesuit agents.


~Therefore 'anyone' or any cult/organization: Roman Vatican, Jesuits, Mormans, Muslims, Anglican, etc. etc. whom commited such atrocities are NOT disciples of Christ-Jesus (CHRIST-ians) nor followers of HIS gospel.



~There are MANY enemies of Christ Jesus and for thousands of years now they have committed 'false-flag' operations (atrocities while flying the banner of Christ Jesus) but anyone that has ever studied the teachings of Christ Jesus (Y' e' shua') understand that these reprobates are operating under a false flag and are not following the teachings of Christ Jesus by any means. (Just as the televangelist Prosperity Teachers of today who pervert the teachings of the Gospels).



~In fact: Historical research will show you that the Roman Vatican sadistically tortured 'and' murdered multitudes of followers of the unadulterated teachings of Christ-Jesus (Y'e'shua'), which they called Christians, under the pretense of herosy against the Vatican organization and the Roman Vatican POPE. Then they later committed the same atrocities under the false flag of 'Christ' when they came to what they now call 'The Americas', further slandering the name of Christ Y'e'shua'/Jesus and perverting HIS message. (Romans 2:24) ... Peace be with you.
 

Hoo-ah,
AnDrew
 22January2017

Is Christ Jesus (Y'e'shua') The White Man's God?

* * *SOME CLARITY FOR THE MISINFORMED* * *
~Y'e'shua' (Jesus) was born unto the tribe of Judah, to a middle eastern Hebrew woman, raised in the middle eastern (asia minor) region of Galilee in the town of Nazareth, and his first disciples were also Asian/Middle Eastern/Asia Minor people of the Hebrew people of various tribes. None of which where white/caucasian men or women. He is 'not' the white-man's-god nor contrary to indigenous Native American people, as some would have ...us believe.
~His teachings spread throughout the entire world and HIS sacrifice was for 'all' nations. Traditional Native teachings from many tribes in the Americas, including my own people, tell of a dark man dressed in white clothing coming here and preaching to the people thousands of years before the white/caucasian men of Latin Spain, Anglo-England, France, etc. came by ships to our homeland...
~There is only 'one' Creator and HE belongs to 'all' nations as all Nations belong to HIM. The Hebrew Y'e'shua' (Jesus) was not white nor exclusive to the white man. It is the nationalistic arrogance of men that make them paint portraits of Christ Jesus (Y'e'shua') as 'white-caucasian' and even as 'black-african' when in fact he was a middle-eastern Asian Hebrew man, from the Judah tribe, whom taught that HE was in fact the Creator come down from the heavens, born into a human body, so that HE could suffer as we all do, overcome this world and sin for our sakes, and sacrifice HIS human body for the propitiation for our sins and reconciliation of our souls back to our Creator that all men might gain eternal life, live eternally upon the 'new' earth under the 'new' heaven, in a glorified 'new' body, where the Creator will no longer dwell hidden in the third heaven but will dwell upon the 'new' earth with His people forever, where there will be nomore sickness, wars, disease, cruelty, hard work or death for all whom accept His sacrifice and believe upon His historically documented resurrection from the dead and seek a relationship with Him through communion with the Holy Spirit. aho~emen.
~The European Roman Vatican, Joseph Smith Mormans, American Black Hebrew Israelite Cult, Church of Yahweh, and many others may have hijacked the gospel and perverted it for their own worldly, selfish, agendas but the UNADULTERATED teachings of Christ Y'e'shua' (Jesus) are certainly not the exclusive property of the Caucasian man nor did they begin in Europe. Peace be with you. aho~emen.
AnDrew
22January2017

Monday, June 27, 2016

~WHAT IS THE TEST FOR THE SUPERIOR METHOD OF HAND-TO-HAND-COMBAT?~




~Jigoro Kano, being a small, weakly, young man studied Japanese Koryu Jujutsu for merely four years and later developed his own approach to Jujutsu, calling it Kano Jujutsu and later Judo, which removed the injurious atemi strikes (eye gouging, testicle kicking, throat striking, etc) and focused upon the standing grappling techniques which could be practiced in full-contact (Randori).


~The traditional Japanese Koryu Jujutsu only trained 'kata' against willing, unresisting, partners and utilized maiming, even lethal, atemi strikes to set up the grappling manuevers and crippling small joint manipulations. This made it almost impossible to safely train against an actual resisting partner in full-contact randori.


~Jigoro Kano believed that safer methods would permit full-contact randori sparring which would build experience and skill that would transition better to actual self-defense. So at only 22years of age Jigoro Kano opened his own school of Kano-Jujutsu aka 'Judo'.


~In 1886 the Tokyo Police Tournament set the stage for Jigoro Kano's modified Kano-Jujutsu, aka Judo, to be tested in full-contact matches against Japan's Koryu Experts. The rules forbade atemi striking, for safety purposes (to avoid eye gouges, ruptured testicles, or a broken hyoid bone with collapsed trachea) and victory was achieved by submission or a throw to one's back (ippon). Kano recruited top practitioners from various Koryu schools, even Aiki-Jujutsu schools, and put them through the full-contact training of his Kano-Jujutsu aka 'Judo' method.


~The Tokyo Police Tournament of 1886 witnessed Kano's Jujutsu/Judo overwhelmingly defeat all of Japan's Koryu masters in full contact challenge matches under the less than lethal rules. ~This led to the Japanese police adopting Kano's Jujutsu/Judo as their official training method for unarmed close-combat. And Kano’s school became the largest and most renown in Japan overnight.


~One school of Koryu Jujutsu trained to specialize in 'ground-grappling', while at that time Kano's school specialized in standing grappling and most often defeated their challengers with standing throws (ippon) to the mat rather than submissions. The school that specialized in 'ground-grappling' with ground-submissions was called Fusen Ryu Jujutsu and they decided to challenge Kano's school in full-contact randori.


~It's been documented by many that the Fusen Ryu practitioners, during the challenge matches, avoided the Kano Jujutsu/Judo practitioners' strength by not remaining standing up but rather going straight to the ground and pulling guard. Thus forcing the Judo grapplers to meet the Fusen Ryu grapplers in their area of expertise which resulted in a shocking first time defeat of Kano's school of Judo in a full-contact challenge. The Fusen Ryu grapplers utilized ground-submissions, not ippon/throws, to defeat the Judo opponents.


~ Immediately Jigoro Kano recognized the weakness in his method of Kano Jujutsu/Judo and quickly began cross-training with the Fusen Ryu to develop viable ground-fighting skills which were integrated into his Kano-Jujutsu/Judo school.


~Yukio Tani was a five foot tall, one hundred and twenty pound, Japanese immigrant to England who gained fame in 1900AD for his full contact challenge matches against all comers. He was renowned for defeating much larger and stronger thugs, brawlers, pugilists, and wrestlers in no-holds-barred matches with only one requirement: that they had to wear a Japanese Jujutsu Gi (a type of jacket) which allowed him to take hold of them to take their balance or to strangle them into submission. When Jigoro Kano visited England, for the purpose of spreading his Judo, and met with Yukio Tani it was a fortuitous moment for Jigoro Kano. He recruited Yukio Tani to help him spread the reputation of Kano’s Judo, via Yukio’s fame as a fighter, and awarded Yukio Tani a second dan on the spot. Yukio Tani accepted for the benefit of being under the umbrella of such a large, growing, organization.

~Years later a man named Carlos Gracie, of Brazil, would study merely four years with a Japanese immigrant whom also was a Kano Jujutsu/Judo expert by the name of Mitsuyo Maeda. This four years of training would be shared with his brothers during practice and eventually led to the development of Gracie Brazilian Jiu-Jitsu after some modifications by Helio Gracie. Like Yukio Tani, Helio Gracie was a very small and physically weak young man. By all accounts of his family members he was never able to perform one body pull-up in all of his life, yet using his modified Kano Jujutsu/Judo he was able to defeat many challengers in full-contact matches throughout Brazil (much like Yukio Tani had done in England) and thereby attract attention to his family’s brand of Jujutsu/Judo.

~Just like the Fusen Ryu ground-grappling specialists that defeated Kano’s early school, before being incorporated into Kano’s school, the Gracie’s also preferred to take down or lure their challengers into fighting them on the ground rather than remaining on their feet.  This strategy placed boxers, karateka, kick boxers, and street brawlers at a distinct disadvantage since they couldn’t utilize the power of their strikes while on the ground at extreme close-quarters.

~The Gracie family soon took their brand of Jujutsu/Judo to North America and began accepting challenges from boxers, wrestlers, kick-boxers, and practitioners of all unarmed Asian martial arts in order to spread their family’s brand of Jujutsu/Judo.  This culminated into a large challenge event with a great deal of marketing and profit for the city of Las Vegas Nevada, U.S.A., where the Gracie family challenged brawlers, fighters, martial artists, and professional fighters from all over the U.S. A. to a full-contact fight match better known as the Ultimate Fighting Challenge. The rules forbade small-joint manipulations, digital chokes, strikes to the knee, strikes to the throat, finger jabs to the eyes, eye gouging, tearing/clawing the face, ripping the ears, seizing the testicles (as well as other rules) although it was promoted to the public as a no-holds-barred fighting challenge to all hand to hand combat experts and empty-hand fighters. The Gracie family sent in one of their smallest family members to represent their family style of Jujutsu in this venue and Gracie Jiu-jitsu earned worldwide recognition as a result of his successes against much stronger and larger fighters of all backgrounds.

~Just as Jigoro Kano’s school was able to defeat all of the other Koryu Jujutsu schools in the 1886 Tokyo Police Tournament by removing small joint manipulations, neck cranks, and atemi striking (which some schools, like Daito Ryu Aiki-Jujutsu, rely heavily upon)  to gain victory and establish a reputation that drew Jigoro Kano’s Judo much respect, fame, and prosperity…Just as the Fusen Ryu school was able to defeat Jigoro Kano’s early school by finding a technical loophole in Jigoro Kano’s approach to hand to hand combat and the rules sanctioned in the match, in refusing to fight standing up (where Judo was strongest) but forcing the Kano Jujutsu/Judo fighters to engage the Fusen Ryu fighters on the ground where the Fusen Ryu practitioners specialized in ground-grappling submissions…Just as the Gracie Family was able to dominate the early Ultimate Fight Challenge (like Jigoro Kano) by removing small-joint manipulations, neck cranks, digital chokes, strikes to the knees, fish hooking the mouth, seizing the testicles (which some martial arts, like Aiki-Jujutsu, almost exclusively rely upon small joint manipulations, neck cranks, and digital chokes to neutralize an attacker) and by forcing the fighters into their area of operation on the ground (like Fusen Ryu ) where Gracie Jiu-jitsu specializes in submissions…I would argue that today one could modify the rules and the venue once again in order to lay the advantage to one’s own method of unarmed combat while also claiming (as did the Gracie’s) that it would provide a more realistic imitation of a real street fight/self-defense situation.

~In the experience of this writer and many others whom have lived an ‘interesting’ life full of actual, real-world, close combat situations for survival and even life or death, a more realistic challenge to provide a test of a combat (martial) art would be to ‘forbid’ all lethal techniques as well as maiming eye gouges from the tournament, but ‘permitting’ small joint manipulations, kicks to the side of the knee, digital chokes, and fish hooking the mouth.  And making it a rule that should or when the fight goes to the ground one party must submit the other party or escape and get back to their feet within two seconds (approximately the amount of time one would have before one’s attacker or opponent could receive violent, or lethal, intervention from his battle-buddies, comrades, brothers, friends, or fellow gang members).

~By placing a 'two or three second max time limit' for one of the fighters to either submit his opponent or escape and get back to his feet, this would make any challenge match more realistic for proving which hand-to-hand-combat method (unarmed martial art) or, better yet, which application of the various unarmed-combat (martial) arts more realistically functions for hand-to-hand-combat and unarmed self-defense.

~The understanding here is that historically it’s been ‘less’ about the techniques from any school of unarmed martial art, or hand-to-hand-combat, that is superior in a close-combat encounter but more so about which school incorporated full-contact randori during their training to develop a relatively safe and realistic simulation of real-world hand-to-hand-combat. Then in the competitive, challenge, aspect against other schools, styles, and practitioners the decisive factor had been more about forcing the opponent to meet you on your own terms, either by imposed rules or by other methods.

~In the safety of a one verses one, man-to-man, hand-to-hand, fight with rules and a referee, with no threat of others jumping in to the aid of one’s opponent, the ground-grappling game ‘certainly’ has historically proven itself advantageous (if not superior) as a method of hand-to-hand-combat.

~However, in real-world combat situations, be it on a battlefield, in the streets, or in a violent prison, working the fight from the ground (like the Fusen Ryu and Gracie Jiu-jitsu schools preferred for defeating their opponents in challenge matches) would be suicidal as an approach to hand-to-hand-combat/self-defense. The ‘ground-escape’ methods, perhaps the best in the world, certainly are efficient for self-defense. It is the preferred method of ‘fighting on the ground’, which certainly is advantageous in a challenge match, that we find to be impractical and suicidal for hand-to-hand-combat/empty hand self-defense in a possible life or death situation.  

~So let’s implement the aforementioned ‘two or three second ground-rule’ and let’s permit  small joint manipulations, digital chokes, fish-hooking, strikes to the knee joint, and ‘no-hand-protection’ and demonstrate how  this would change the outcome of an ultimate fighting challenge designed to study which methods are more efficient and effective for a hand-to-hand-combat situation in the real-world (I/E: violent street gang assault, prison assault, assault during a riot, or hand-to-hand on a battle-field.)

27June2016

AnDrew Soldier, in collaboration

 with Author N. Cognito.


Recommended source of historical information:
'Mastering Jujutsu' by Renzo Gracie and John Danaher.